Further OT: fonts (was Re: OT: Carriage return inserts in MS Exchange email -- fix?)
"Karsten M. Self" <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:58:33 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20050722065833.GA23696@localhost> |
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable on Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 08:10:35AM +0200, A. Pagaltzis ([email protected]) w= rote: > * Karsten M. Self <[email protected]> [2005-07-22 04:40]: > > on Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:41:30AM +0200, A. Pagaltzis ([email protected]= e) wrote: > > > I???ve had the same problem for a while. > >=20 > > Yes, and interesting quotes you've got....=20 >=20 > They???re curly quotes, encoded as UTF-8, just as my headers > declare. Don???t blame *me* if your MUA can???t handle that. :-) I think my MTA's fine. And I think my terminal (urxvt) is fine. It's likely X fonts. I'm using 7x13, which is an alias of -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--13-120-75-75-c-70-iso8859-1 Gotta love X and fonts and unicode and ...=20 Trying a few obvious things (setting locale, other tricks...). Hrm. Well, I can get 'em to go from '???' to an 'a-hat'. =20 > > Apparently webmail's out of the question, though I suspect > > gmail might fix much of this brain-deadedness. >=20 > Gmail would fix all these problems, indeed. So would Yahoo!Mail, > in fact, as well as a surprising number of other web-based > freemailers, despite their lack of Googlesque focus on threading. >=20 > * Karsten M. Self <[email protected]> [2005-07-22 04:40]: > > :0 fhw > > | $FORMAIL -R "Content-Type:" "X-Original-Content-Type:" > >=20 > > :0 fhw > > | $FORMAIL -a "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D\"iso-8859-1\"; form= at=3D\"flowed\"" >=20 > Note that if you simply use `-i`, then the original header will > be preserved, prefixed with `Old-`. =20 Hrm. That's a point. I like X-headers myself, as they're pretty much assured safe. Peace. --=20 Karsten M. Self <[email protected]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. - Donald Knuth --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC4JkZefG8443k044RAq+GAKCLCb4p7lgiJ1LdRRicQnf8ZYpeNwCeKWe0 DIL6EDxiz3Ghj5Jd07PVoko= =EZ6m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--