Re: Mozilla For Profit?
Eric Renaud <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Aug 2005 12:01:35 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Randy Kramer wrote: >On Wednesday 03 August 2005 11:09 am, Anthony Long wrote: > > >>Was wondering if some of the Mozilla board members on this list and >>others could weigh in on why the change and how the new corporation >>intends to make money and also thoughts on similar strategies for other >>consumer-facing open source projects like OpenOffice.org. >> >> > >The following is definitely OT for this list, but I'm curious (or more): > > * Can a corporation be created with no stockholders? (Is that what a >subchapter S (or some other letter) corporation is?) Or, more to the point: >could I create my own corporation with no stockholders and achieve the >benefit of freedom from (most) personal liability that is achieved by a >traditional corporation? (Or, is creating a corporation with no stockholders >something that only some non-human entity (like the Mozilla Foundation) able >to achieve?) > > Absolutely. Corporations are set up to protect individuals - 'S' corps fit the bill for most sole proprietors. No stock need be issued. > * It's not 100% clear from the article--has the Mozilla Foundation lost any >tax-exempt status they might have had as a non-profit? > >Sorry for the noise! > >Randy Kramer > > >