Re: intel supports content protection
Seth Johnson <[email protected]> Sat, 03 Sep 2005 16:16:40 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Organization | Real Measures |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Virtualization means turning the logic chip into an object chip, ostensibly for the purpose of security. It means preventing you from working on a kernel on your own box -- it turns the chip into a closed kernel, that lets somebody else put a software object on your box that you can only interact with via messages. There's a whole community that equates "virtualization" with "security" through this model. Seth Johnson Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > >From todays San Jose Mercury: > Intel's new chip will feature qualities such as computing in > 64-bit chunks instead of today's 32-bits, as well as > virtualization, so that more than one operating system can be > run simultaneously. ==>Built-in hardware encryption will provide > better security.<== > > Does this mean that future operating systems will support actual > **working** content protection schemes? > > jon -- RIAA is the RISK! Our NET is P2P! http://www.nyfairuse.org/action/ftc DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders! New Yorkers for Fair Use http://www.nyfairuse.org [CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of this incidentally recorded communication. Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of exclusive rights.