RE: JBoss aquired by Red Hat

"Anderson, Kelly" <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:55:14 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Personally, I don't think there is a natural strategic=20=0D=0A> alignmen=
t between IBM and Red Hat.  IBM doesn't want to be in=20=0D=0A> the GNU/Lin=
ux distribution business.  They support Red Hat to=20=0D=0A> be in that bus=
iness, and they used to support S.U.S.E as well=20=0D=0A> (I don't know whe=
ther they support Novell).  I don't think=20=0D=0A> there is a long term al=
ignment beyond that.=0D=0A=0D=0AAs long as Microsoft is so dominant, there =
will always be a reason for=0D=0AIBM, Novell, Red Hat and everyone else to =
have at least some pressure=0D=0Atoward cooperation.=0D=0A=0D=0A-Kelly=0D=0A=0D=
=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AE-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or o=
ther malicious code. By reading the message and opening any attachments, th=
e recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective action agains=
t such code. Sender is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this =
message.=0D=0A=0D=0AThe information in this e-mail is confidential and may =
be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access t=
o this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.=0D=0A