RE: JBoss aquired by Red Hat
"Anderson, Kelly" <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:55:14 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Personally, I don't think there is a natural strategic=20=0D=0A> alignmen= t between IBM and Red Hat. IBM doesn't want to be in=20=0D=0A> the GNU/Lin= ux distribution business. They support Red Hat to=20=0D=0A> be in that bus= iness, and they used to support S.U.S.E as well=20=0D=0A> (I don't know whe= ther they support Novell). I don't think=20=0D=0A> there is a long term al= ignment beyond that.=0D=0A=0D=0AAs long as Microsoft is so dominant, there = will always be a reason for=0D=0AIBM, Novell, Red Hat and everyone else to = have at least some pressure=0D=0Atoward cooperation.=0D=0A=0D=0A-Kelly=0D=0A=0D= =0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AE-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or o= ther malicious code. By reading the message and opening any attachments, th= e recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective action agains= t such code. Sender is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this = message.=0D=0A=0D=0AThe information in this e-mail is confidential and may = be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access t= o this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.=0D=0A