Re: hmm
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Organization | The XEmacs Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Jean" == Jean Camp <[email protected]> writes: Jean> But it is hard to quantify what is essentially a culture of Jean> gifts, demand for freedom, self-respect*, and joy of fine Jean> craftsmanship There should be a period right here. So, show me a satisfactory formal/quantitative model of these things. Here, I'll go first (sans "satisfactory", the examples I give are research in progress, currently controversial): Jean> on a model that begins by defining these out of existence. "The model" does not define anything out of existence. There is ample precedent for economists finding ways to treat gifts (in fact, all recent work on the economics of social security _must_ refer to various kinds of gift motive, or be laughed out of the editor's office) and self-respect (a topic close to the theme of a recent undergraduate thesis explicitly concerned with "why hackers do it", he chose to try to model Raymond's "Homesteading" argument) in the model. Quantifying these is simply not easy; we know we have to do it, but the modeling of the "goods" themselves, and thus analytically capturing the regularities of behavior that we attribute to "a culture of gifts, demand for freedom, self-respect*, and joy of fine craftsmanship", remains extremely controversial. It is, of course, possible that economics is simply the wrong framework for dealing with these ideas formally or quantitatively. I would like to deal with them in a way that permits formulating their impact on the economy in quantitative ways. If you can point me at a better framework, please do so. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.