Re: Open Source Developer Exchange
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Organization | The XEmacs Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Nik" == Nik Cubrilovic <[email protected]> writes: Nik> As part of being the intermediary, you can identify overlap Nik> with existing solutions and incorporate that (save Nik> development by not reinventing the wheel - only possible with Nik> Open Source). True for open source developers and other small (is beautiful and we never wanna get too big) businesses. From the customer's point of view, why not go with someone big enough to join patent pools and pay RSA-style license fees? (And it's not either/or---you can always go with the biggest fish in _that_ game, and it ain't Bill Gates's l'il ol' company neither. They are also one of the biggest players in mega-corporation open source. Big Blue.) So yes, you can do this. But don't try to sell it to your customers as something only open source can do. Sell it to them as (a) cheaper and (b) no vendor lock-in as long as there's a single unemployed programmer left in the world. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.