Re: Text of SCO's complaint
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Organization | The XEmacs Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> writes: Brian> the second because it's too esoteric (unless they're lucky Brian> and get a good lawyer and a gullible jury). Not at all esoteric. We know where to get those lawyers and juries. But they would have to file a completely different suit to make that fly, one based on anti-trust law. It probably could be done (not that you'd want to go up against IBM et el, even the Justice Department would quail at that). However, almost certainly the case would go in IBM's favor. Making a predation case stick requires showing that that the defendent profits directly from the predation by _monopolizing that market_. Setting price to zero to drive out competition is predation, open-and-shut---except that releasing under a FOSS license would seem to be very close to a prima facie defense. One thing that U.S. v. IBM legally demonstrated is that "harm to competitors" is not prima facie "harm to competition". Things are swinging back now, but they depend not on invalidating that precendent (no judge would do that), but on finding different ways to show "harm to competition" derived from "harm to competitors". You could probably win a predation case if (for example) IBM retained patent in a technology essential to the "category-killer" FS released, and the threat of that was used to keep others from releasing their applications on top of an improved version of the FS. However, I doubt that "an evil proprietary encryption protocol" running on top of Apache would be enough for Microsoft to win a suit alleging the bottom dropped out of the ISS market because Apache is so much better. The judge would look at the smoking gun in Gates's hand and the smoking hole in his foot, bang the gavel, and call "Case dismissed; MSFT's unwillingness to adopt Apache technology is not damage caused by members of the Apache Foundation." I speculate that it is exactly this property of free software as a (legally) risk-free competitive weapon that has IBM and others strategically interested in it now. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.