RE: Research questions WRT SCO's complaint
Nik Cubrilovic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Another interesting story: <http://dir.salon.com/tech/fsp/2000/09/12/chapter_7_part_one/index.html?pn=2> About how IBM beat out a local group of hackers on the port of Linux to the S/390. So much for all the arguments from SCO, looks like IBM just got in on having their code included as part of the port. "For the better part of two years, Vepstas and a small cadre of programmers had been writing their own version of Linux capable of running on the 390. The project was called Bigfoot, and it had attracted a fair amount of admiring -- even if somewhat perplexed -- attention from the Linux community." Another instance of SCO point 82 being found to be false Quote point 82: "Virtually none of these software developers and hobbyists had access to enterprise-scale equipment and testing facilities for Linux development. Without access to such equipment, facilities, sophisticated methods, concepts and coordinated know-how, it would be difficult or impossible for the Linux development community to create a grade of Linux adequate for enterprise use." Project Bigfoot seems to be as "enterprise" as you can get, dispelling the myths perpetuated by SCO in their submission. Nik