Re: [mh] Your help re Genericising Error and log handling

On 1/12/21 11:00 AM, Rick Steeves wrote:
> Might it not make more sense to modify print_log, so that, as is, it 
> keeps working as expected, but in any case that print_log was called 
> with more than one parameter then new things happened?
>
> That makes all the existing code keep working, but new code (or people 
> modifying existing code) could just add parameters.
>
> If you were going to do a search/replace for print_log, you're still 
> going to have to find all the cases of it and manually adjust them for 
> what you want to have happen.
>
> That would avoid creating a new function, have it keep working as-is 
> in all the existing code, and let it be adjusted on a case-by-case basis. 


I agree with Rick.




________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from this list, go to: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/misterhouse-users