Cactus Rules
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:10:14 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o CR. Note 1 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o With an eye toward the aims of the NKS Forum, I've begun to work out a translation of the "elementary cellular automaton rules" (ECAR's), in effect, just the boolean functions of abstract type q : B^3 -> B, into cactus language, and I'll post a selection of my working notes here. By way of the briefest possible reminder, this cactus syntax, in its existential interpretation and its traverse-string redaction, uses just two series of k-adic connectives, first, the concatenation of k expressions is read as their k-adic logical conjunction, second, a bracket of the form (e_1, ..., e_k) is read to say that exactly one of the k expressions e_1, ..., e_k is false. I may sometimes refer to this bracket as a k-adic "boundary operator" or a k-place "cactus lobe". Reference Material: http://atlas.wolfram.com/ http://atlas.wolfram.com/01/01/ http://atlas.wolfram.com/01/01/views/3/TableView.html http://atlas.wolfram.com/01/01/views/172/TableView.html Incidental Musement: http://www.pinball.com/games/cactus/ Jon Awbrey o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o