Re: Hypostatic And Prescisive Abstraction
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o HAPA. Note 7 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o | Exceedingly important are the relatives signifying "-- is a quality of --" | and "-- is a relation of -- to --". It may be said that mathematical | reasoning (which is the only deductive reasoning, if not absolutely, | at least eminently) almost entirely turns on the consideration of | abstractions as if they were objects. The protest of nominalism | against such hypostatisation, although, if it knew how to formulate | itself, it would be justified as against much of the empty disputation | of the medieval Dunces, yet, as it was and is formulated, is simply a | protest against the only kind of thinking that has ever advanced human | culture. Nobody will work long with the logic of relatives -- unless | he restricts the problems of his studies very much -- without seeing | that this is true. | | C.S. Peirce, CP 3.509, "The Logic of Relatives", |'The Monist', vol. 7, pp. 161-217, 1897. |'Collected Papers', CP 3.456-552. o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o