Re: Effective Logical Formalism
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o ELF. Discussion Note 3 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o This is where I put the brass tacks to the syntax of the "effective logical formalism" (ELF). I am sensitive to the likelihood that different people in the ELF market probably have different notions of what makes up the brass tacks for them, and so this constitutes a user-relative parameter of the task, in other words, a "pragmatic consideration". Since I stated that I put minimal logical demands on the ELF you have probably been waiting for the other shoe to drop. Here it is. This particular user demands the following sorts of things of the ELF, no if's and's or but's. It has to help with the practical problems of a logical nature that I face on a daily basis, and it has to adapt itself to the way that I naturally or enculturally think about these recurring problems, at least at first, unless or until it can help me to see better ways. Tomorrow I'll discuss these brass tacks in detail. Jon Awbrey o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o