Re: Zeroth Order Ontology
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o ZOO. Discussion Note 5 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o Under the Sunday Supplement "Link Of A Link" category, be sure to check out the home page of knot theorist Lou Kauffman, especially his "Box Algebra Exercise". Because I am trying to focus on the problems of actually computing things, I will have to stick with finite strings and trees for quite a while, but Kauffman's work will give you a taste of what a semantics for infinite and/or re-entrant logical expressions would have to be like. These issues come up in the branch of topology that studies knots, and they provide an intuitive foundation for the study of so-called "non-well-founded set theory" that was already underway twenty years before Peter Aczel's book came out, though of course one can trace the dimmer beginnings of the subject way back before either one of these sources. http://www.lawsofform.org/ http://www2.math.uic.edu/~kauffman/ http://www2.math.uic.edu/~kauffman/Arithmetic.htm Jon Awbrey o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o