Re: Topic :> Dynamics Of Ontologies
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Dec 2003 20:48:03 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o Topic :> Dynamics Of Ontologies 9 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o Visible Inquiry (cont.) A phenomenon presents itself in the world at large and exhibits some quality or other that attracts our attention. At first we simply observe the phenomenon and collect some data, perhaps in an informal way, perhaps more formally. Speaking very broadly, we may describe this activity as "observation" and think of it as forming a link from the phenomenon in question to a growing set of descriptive data. Figure 2.1 shows where this process falls on the map that was previously sketched in Figure 2. o-----------------------------------------------------------o | | | Phenomenon | | o | | > | | > | | > | | Observation | | > | | > | | > | | > Descriptive | | > Data | | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | o-----------------------------------------------------------o Figure 2.1. Dynamics of Inquiry -- Observation Many a phenomenon that attracts our notice will do so because of some problematic quality that it has for us. It may surprise us, or unsettle us, or upset us in any one of a numberless legion of different ways, but generally speaking we find ourselves incited to some sort of action that will settle the account, at times by finding an explanation that reduces the quality of surprise, and at times by finding a plan of action that resolves the upsetting quality of the objective reality that makes its appearance to us in the form of the problematic phenomenon. Whatever activity we undertake, it will usually depend for its rationality on finding an explanation and perhaps even forming a theory of the laws and principles that govern the phenomenon. This process of guessing at explanations has generally been referred to as "abduction" or as "abductive reasoning" by logicians, philosophers, and others from Aristotle to C.S. Peirce and on to the contemporary scene. Figure 2.2 traces the steps that we've passed through so far. o-----------------------------------------------------------o | | | Phenomenon | | o | | > | | > | | > | | Observation | | > | | > | | > | | > Descriptive | | > Data | | 1 | | < | | < | | < | | < | | Abduction | | < | | < | | < | | < | | Initial 2 | | Theory | | | o-----------------------------------------------------------o Figure 2.2. Dynamics of Inquiry -- Abduction Jon Awbrey o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o http://www.cs.bsu.edu/homepages/mighty/history.html o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o