Re: What Is Information That A Sign May Bear It? -- Discussion
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:15:00 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o WIS Discussion. Note 13 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o Re: WIS 12. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05296.html In: WIS. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/thrd19.html#04317 Hugh, One of the themes that I hoped to illustrate with my story of uncertainty was that concepts, like the concepts of information and now probability, are more or less complex intellectual instruments that are evolved by nature and developed by us to their own proper ends, but like many other forms of complex organization, concepts can have their life, make their sense, and have their utility only under the requisite conditions of use, but they fail to have even the token guarantee that they normally have, when those conditions are not in force. To get a sense of the sort of set-up that has to be put in place, or that's assumed to be already in place, before the usual array of concepts from probability theory can even begin to make sense, you might well look into the first few pages of a standard text, for instance, the work that I append a few excerpts from below. Jon Awbrey PAS. Probability And Statistics 01. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg04885.html 02. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg04886.html 03. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg04887.html 04. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg04888.html 05. The above material is excerpted from: | Hoel, P.G., Port, S.C., & Stone, C.J., |'Introduction to Probability Theory', | Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 1971. o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o http://www.cs.bsu.edu/homepages/mighty/history.html o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o