ONT Re: Prospects for Inquiry Driven Systems
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:12:54 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o PRO. Note 47 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o 2.2. Differential Geometry and Logic Programming In this Subdivision we make a quick reconnaissance of the bordering areas between logic and geometry, charting a beeline for selected trouble spots. In the following Subdivisions we will return to more carefully survey the grounds needed to address these problems and begin settling this frontier. 2.2.1. Differences and Difficulties Why have I chosen differential geometry and logic programming to try bringing together? A clue may be picked up in the quotation below. When the foundations of that ingenious duplex, AI and cybernetics, were being poured, one who took part in the ground-breaking engraved these words in a cornerstone of the structure: | The most fundamental concept in cybernetics is that of "difference", | either that two things are recognisably different or that one thing | has changed with time. (Ashby, 1956, p. 9). A deliberate continuity of method extends from this use of difference in goal-seeking behavior to the baby steps of AI per se, namely, the use of difference-reduction methods in the form of what is variously described as means-ends analysis, goal regression, or general problem solving. Jon Awbrey o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o http://www.cs.bsu.edu/homepages/mighty/history.html o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o