Re: How to deal with "Out of memory detected" during reasoning

Timothy Redmond <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.misc.ontology.protege.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
You can't run SQWRL directly on Protege 4 yet.  But SWRL rules that only 
use the standard built-ins should work with Protege 4 reasoners.

-Timothy


On 7/11/12 6:52 AM, Wentao Zhou wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
> Thanks for your kind reply.
> The problem have not been solved yet since I set the heap size about 
> 80% of my free physical memory. Yep, protege 4.x can support several 
> more powerful reasoners, and I have tried there, which did not get 
> such problem.
> The reason why I still want to use protege 3.x is that I can edit 
> and run SPARQL and SQWRL query directly on protege 3.x. while, without 
> reasoner, the query cannot response some implicit results. Are there 
> SPARQLTab or SQWRL editor (or other similiar solutions) working with 
> protege 4.x where I can edit and run the query directly?
> Bests,
> Wentao
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03

_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion

Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.