Re: Performance degraded with MS SQLServer backend for Protege 3.4.8

Timothy Redmond <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.misc.ontology.protege.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/23/12 12:11 PM, Ron Schultz wrote:
> Are there any benchmarks for expected performance of the database 
> backend? Can I expect to manage thousands, or hundreds of thousands, 
> or millions of records with the backend? Are there any user 
> experiences reported for using Protege backend for ontologies with 
> hundred of thousands instances?

I think that, for the Protege database backend, this is the wrong 
metric.  The problem is that the database is an internal structure and a 
record count does not relate to the nature of the ontology being 
loaded.  In particular, row counts might be very different for the 
Protege 3 database backend and the Clark-Parsia database backend which 
both work with the Protege 3 api.  That said there was a group that 
worked with a database on a day to day basis that had somewhere near 2 
million rows.

More ontological measurements of that same ontology include:

  * 1.2 million axioms
  * 121 thousand logical axioms
  * 87 thousand classes


-Timothy



> Thanks
> Ron
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Jonathan Carter 
> <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Some of my user community and I have noticed that the performance
>     of Protege 3 (Frames) has changed significantly for the worse
>     between version 3.4.4 and version 3.4.8 when using a MS SQLServer
>     database backend.
>
>     Protege 3.4.4 performs well with large numbers of instances backed
>     by SQLServer whereas 3.4.8 seems noticeably slow.
>     Performance is much the same for both versions (or possibly better
>     in Protege 3.4.8) for file-based projects and MySQL database backends.
>
>     Is there anything that's changed in the database handling between
>     these versions that might explain this (and might also be in 3.5B)?
>     Has anyone else had a problem with performance and database
>     backends with 3.4.8?
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Jonathan
>     _______________________________________
>
>     Jonathan Carter
>     Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd
>     Mobile: +44 (0) 7904 198295 <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%207904%20198295>
>     Email: [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     _______________________________________
>
>     Proud sponsors of The Essential Project
>     The free open-source Enterprise Architecture Management Platform
>     www.enterprise-architecture.org
>     <http://www.enterprise-architecture.org/>
>     _______________________________________
>
>     Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd, Registered in England and
>     Wales: 04097721.
>     Registered Office: 76 High Street, Newport Pagnell, Milton Keynes,
>     MK16 8AQ.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     protege-discussion mailing list
>     [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
>     Instructions for unsubscribing:
>     http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Ron
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03

_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion

Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.