Re: Performance degraded with MS SQLServer backend for Protege 3.4.8
Timothy Redmond <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.ontology.protege.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/23/12 12:11 PM, Ron Schultz wrote: > Are there any benchmarks for expected performance of the database > backend? Can I expect to manage thousands, or hundreds of thousands, > or millions of records with the backend? Are there any user > experiences reported for using Protege backend for ontologies with > hundred of thousands instances? I think that, for the Protege database backend, this is the wrong metric. The problem is that the database is an internal structure and a record count does not relate to the nature of the ontology being loaded. In particular, row counts might be very different for the Protege 3 database backend and the Clark-Parsia database backend which both work with the Protege 3 api. That said there was a group that worked with a database on a day to day basis that had somewhere near 2 million rows. More ontological measurements of that same ontology include: * 1.2 million axioms * 121 thousand logical axioms * 87 thousand classes -Timothy > Thanks > Ron > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Jonathan Carter > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Some of my user community and I have noticed that the performance > of Protege 3 (Frames) has changed significantly for the worse > between version 3.4.4 and version 3.4.8 when using a MS SQLServer > database backend. > > Protege 3.4.4 performs well with large numbers of instances backed > by SQLServer whereas 3.4.8 seems noticeably slow. > Performance is much the same for both versions (or possibly better > in Protege 3.4.8) for file-based projects and MySQL database backends. > > Is there anything that's changed in the database handling between > these versions that might explain this (and might also be in 3.5B)? > Has anyone else had a problem with performance and database > backends with 3.4.8? > > Thanks > > Jonathan > _______________________________________ > > Jonathan Carter > Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd > Mobile: +44 (0) 7904 198295 <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%207904%20198295> > Email: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > _______________________________________ > > Proud sponsors of The Essential Project > The free open-source Enterprise Architecture Management Platform > www.enterprise-architecture.org > <http://www.enterprise-architecture.org/> > _______________________________________ > > Enterprise Architecture Solutions Ltd, Registered in England and > Wales: 04097721. > Registered Office: 76 High Street, Newport Pagnell, Milton Keynes, > MK16 8AQ. > > > _______________________________________________ > protege-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion > > Instructions for unsubscribing: > http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 > > > > > -- > Ron > > > _______________________________________________ > protege-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion > > Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 _______________________________________________ protege-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03