Re: Referring to classes outside an ontology
Matthew Horridge <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.ontology.protege.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Joachim, This seems o.k. to me. (Providing faldo;Region expands to the full IRI of the class in the external ontology). The light font-weight (as opposed to bold) indicates that you haven't said anything about the class in the current ontology. Cheers, Matthew On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:39, Joachim Baran wrote: > Hello, > > I would just like to hear some feedback whether my approach of integrating classes outside of my own ontology is correct. > > I added the following snippet to my ontology, where I basically want to express that the range of my "region" object property is an instance of the "Region" class from the FALDO ontology. > > <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://www.sequenceontology.org/gff3#GFF3_0021"> > <rdfs:label>region</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://www.sequenceontology.org/gff3#GFF3_0002"/> > <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&faldo;Region"/> > </owl:ObjectProperty> > > When I load the ontology in Protege 4.1, I see that "Region" has been added to the class list, but it is shown in a normal type rather than bold faced. > > Is this the right approach to link out to other ontologies and is it expected that the other class appears among my defined classes? > > Thanks, > Joachim > > _______________________________________________ > protege-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion > > Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 _______________________________________________ protege-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03