Re: Protege 3.4.8: Forms broken for included Projects on Protege Server

Hi Tania,

thanks for the information. Unfortunately it was planned to do a
companywide rollout of Protege 3.4.8. I think i will have to copy the forms
information from the included Project to the other one (I already have a
little tool that does the work).

Is there any possibility to get more detailed information what has changed
between the releases. The 3.4.8 release notes did not mention any changes
on the client-server part of protege.

Hanno

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Tania Tudorache <[email protected]>wrote:

>  Hi Hanno,
>
> Indeed, the forms inclusion is not working after Protege 3.4.7 version. We
> have implemented a new way of sending the pprj info from the server to the
> client, which is much faster than before. You will notice that clients load
> much faster now. The part of code that did the forms inclusion had to be
> dropped in the new implementation. Adding it back would require some effort.
>
> My suggestion is to use an "older" version of Protege, like 3.4.7 that
> still uses the original way of loading the remote pprj. The other changes
> we have done to the code are quite minor, so you would still be up to date,
> and have the forms working.
>
> Tania
>
>
>
>
> On 11/09/2012 05:57 AM, Hanno Wunderlich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>  i'm currently testing to switch our Protege Server from version 3.4.0 to
> 3.4.8.
>  We are heavily using projects that are including other projects. For
> example we have a master project holding the classes, slots and the form
> information. Then there is a second project including the master project,
> that holds only the instances.
>
>  If I open the second project as a local project all forms are correct.
> If I host the second project on a protege server an access it from a
> client, the forms are broken.
>
>  I have also reproduced this behaviour with a fresh protege installation
> and a newly created project that includes the newspaper project from the
> examples.
>
>  I haven't checked the behaviour on versions between 3.4.0 and 3.4.8.
>
>  Regards,
>  Hanno
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing [email protected]://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>

_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion

Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03