Re: WebProtege portlet development resources

Tania Tudorache <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.misc.ontology.protege.general
Organization Biomedical Informatics Research
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 01/22/2013 02:14 PM, Umashanthi Pavalanathan wrote:
> Hi Tania,
>
> Thanks so much for the documentation.
> I was able to build a new portlet following existing portlet code. 
> Your documentation will be definitely useful to build it quickly.
>
Glad to hear that!

> I guess step 3 of creating a tab should also be followed when creating 
> a portlet.

Yes, definitely. I added the UIFactory step for the portlets a few hours 
after sending the email, when I realized I forgot it :)

If you have any more questions about the portlets or tab development, 
please post them on the list, and I will update the wiki right away, so 
that others can also benefit.

Thank you!
Tania


>
> Thanks again,
> Umashanthi
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Tania Tudorache 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Umashanthi,
>
>     I have added some documentation on how to implement your own
>     WebProtege tabs and portlets on the wiki:
>
>     http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/WebProtegeImplementationGuide
>
>     I hope this will help.
>
>     Tania
>
>
>
>
>     On 01/07/2013 07:15 AM, Umashanthi Pavalanathan wrote:
>>     Hi Matthew,
>>
>>     Thanks for the link. I have already gone through it to checkout
>>     the code and setting up the dev environment.
>>     I am interested in resources regarding portlet development, such
>>     as the details about which abstract classes to implement,
>>     configurations to make the new portlet available in WebProtege
>>     web app, etc. I've started looking into the source code of
>>     existing portlets to learn these. But any resources with such
>>     details would be very helpful.
>>
>>     I am interested in developing a portlet to pull up data from a
>>     storage system and display additional resources we have for each
>>     individual instance.
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Umashanthi
>>
>>
>>     On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Matthew Horridge
>>     <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>>         The latest version of WebProtege is 2.0 but this is under
>>         heavy development and it quite unstable at the moment.  Some
>>         documents for 1.0 development are here though:
>>
>>         http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/WebProtegeDevelopersGuide
>>
>>         Out of interest, what customised features do you want?
>>
>>         Cheers,
>>
>>         Matthew
>>
>>
>>         On 4 Jan 2013, at 18:19, Umashanthi Pavalanathan wrote:
>>
>>         > Hi,
>>         >
>>         > I am trying to develop a portlet for WebProtege to add
>>         customized features.
>>         > I am wondering whether there are any resources available
>>         regarding portlet development.
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > Thanks,
>>         > Umashanthi
>>         > _______________________________________________
>>         > protege-discussion mailing list
>>         > [email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         >
>>         https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>         >
>>         > Instructions for unsubscribing:
>>         http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         protege-discussion mailing list
>>         [email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>>         Instructions for unsubscribing:
>>         http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     protege-discussion mailing list
>>     [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>>     Instructions for unsubscribing:http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     protege-discussion mailing list
>     [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
>     Instructions for unsubscribing:
>     http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03

_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion

Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.