"Downsizing" from concept to data
André Luiz Tietböhl Ramos <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.ontology.protege.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1362598913.6416.24.camel@Sigmatech> |
Hello, I'm trying to establish a contextual architecture for a given manufacturing domain and am facing a challenge I could not solve so far. The challenge is like this: in a given manufacturing concept, say an operation as milling, there are manufacturing data limits such as cutting speed, etc. when it becomes actual data. How to define such concept? My approach to handle this aspect was to develop an objectProperty, for instance manufacturing_operation_has_limits with Domains and Ranges intersection: list_of_real and real. In addition, I defined a new individual called limit with type list_of_real. Therefore my question is threefold, 1. How could the actual individual be used when it refers to an interval instead of referring only to one actual data value? 2. Do I need a data property as well? BTW, I already defined one called to_define_limit with Domains (intersection) list_of_real, real and Ranges float, double. It does not show the individual previously defined limit. How to use it, please? 3. How to link the data property to either an object property or a class? Thanks in advance! -- André Luiz Tietböhl Ramos http://www.feng.pucrs.br/~andreltr _______________________________________________ protege-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03