RMI server scalability for Protege Frames 3.5 editor
John Pierre <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:26:57 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.ontology.protege.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADwK6dw9iyKYj4h=XqJu_fxiDyMuB5ny1vahGxHYqO84xyjUxg@mail.gmail.com> |
We are trying to set up a collaborative installation so multiple developers can edit a Frames ontology. The ontology currently has about 25,000 frames. We have successfully configured the RMI server and can connect clients to the server and access the example ontologies across the network. The problem is that our 25,000 frame ontology isn't able to load into the clients when accessed across the network. Our ontology is MySQL backed. The ontology loads fine when accessed on the same machine without going through the rmi server. The ontology loads but takes several minutes to do so when running the client and server on the same machine through the localhost loopback. The ontology loading hangs and cannot load when running the client and server on different machines either on a wide area network (20+Mbps) nor on a local area Ethernet network (100+Mbps). After waiting 30 mins or so we get broken pipes and/or timed out connections. The ontology loads if the MySQL database is accessed across the network directly without using the client-server (.pprj file is on the client side but points to a MySQL database hosted on the network) Therefore the culprit seems to be network demands of the rmi server. We have -Dserver.use.compression=true turned on at the server. We've tried -Dserver.client.preload.skip=true on the client side. It seems this 25,000 frame ontology might be too large for the RMI client-server architecture, but the Protege documentation seems to hint that much larger ontologies have been developed using Protege. Questions: 1. What is the practical scalability limit of the Protege RMI client-server in terms of ontology size? 2. Are there additional configuration settings that we can try to get our ontology to load? 3. Are there other collaboration models we could try for allowing multiple people to work on a large scale Frames ontology besides the rmi client-server approach? Thanks in advance for your help. John _______________________________________________ protege-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03