Re: [protege-user] Question about OWL RDF-Based Semantics

Just two different notations for the same statement: the first one is in
RDF/Turtle, the second - near RDF/XML.
Tools can read and save in different notations the same ontology.

So it's not about semantics, it's about syntax.

Alex

вс, 19 янв. 2025 г. в 22:20, Steve Vestal via protege-user <
[email protected]>:

> For example, the input file contained the statement
>
> oslc:Error a rdfs:Class ;
>
> but the saved file had the statement
>
> oslc:Error rdf:type owl:Class ;
>
>
> On 1/19/2025 11:59 AM, Samson Tu wrote:
>
> Can you explain what you meant by the modifications Protégé (OWLAPI) makes to the initial input?
>
> Samson
>
>
> On Jan 19, 2025, at 5:46 AM, Steve Vestal via protege-user <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Someone recently pointed me to the "OWL 2 Web Ontology Language RDF-Based Semantics (Second Edition)" standard.  I was aware that Protege (OWLAPI) does some modifications to the initial input in some cases.  Are those modifications based on the RDF to DL transformations described in that standard?  Is this related to OWL Full?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-user mailing [email protected]://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
>

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user