[protege-user] Arguments for and against OWL

Ann Clark via protege-user <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.misc.ontology.protege.owl
Message-ID <SY4PR01MB5820045F1400440795DF80ACE9E62@SY4PR01MB5820.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> 
I'm seeing some noise online (LinkedIn) arguing against using OWL. The main argument seems to be  that OWL is not human readable, by people who do not appear to have learned OWL.

Has anyone on this list got a good list of pros and cons for using OWL for applied ontology? Or, any articles arguing for OWL?

Thank you in advance.

Ann


Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.