Re: [protege-user] OWL Reasoner for WebProtege

Michael DeBellis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.misc.ontology.protege.owl
Message-ID <CALGFikcfQT+E1JXzxNDEj21JjMja3+MjeAqukF1jGpm-1pXQiw@mail.gmail.com>
Piotr, I can't answer your question, and you probably know this but just in
case you don't and you can't find a way, there are some work arounds.  You
can export your ontology from Web Protege, load it into the desktop
version, run the reasoner and then make changes if you find any issues
using the reasoner. The nice thing is you can then upload the changed file
back to Web Protege, and the version history is kept consistent. In the
history on Web Protege it looks as if you made all the changes that were
actually done on the Desktop version in Web Protege. Another work around is
you can use "Save Inferred Axioms as Ontology" in Desktop Protege and then
upload that to Web Protege. I don't think that saves every possible
reasoner inference but it saves most of them. I don't use Web Protege much
now but when I did and I used that option I never found any inferences that
I needed but weren't saved. If you try this approach, just pay careful
attention to the settings in Web Protege and Desktop Protege for new
entities. This may no longer be the case but it used to be that when you
upload a new ontology to Web Protege it didn't pick up the settings for new
IRIs from Desktop Protege. The first time I tried going back and forth
between Web and Desktop Protege I ended up with one set of IRIs for
entities created in the Desktop version and another for those created in
Web Protege. This is easy to fix, in fact I recommend anyone who uses Web
Protege does this anyway, but make sure you manually set the parameters in
Web Protege for new entity IRIs rather than just accept the defaults.

Michael

On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 2:48 AM Piotr Nowara <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to use WebProtege with an OWL reasoner (ideally ELK) - is
> there any support for integrating an OWL reasoner? If not, do you have any
> suggestions on how I could implement it?
>
> Best,
> Piotr
> _______________________________________________
> protege-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
>

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.