Re: [protege-user] ! [WARN] No ODBA model ... ?
Jean-Louis Janin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.ontology.protege.owl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Lorenz, Thank you for your answer. I installed the Ontop plugin a few months ago as a possible reasoner and found out it was of no use for my project, still happy with HermiT. My concern was to find some way to export annotations and object properties of LEXEAU ontology's direct instances into entries and lexical relations of a Water lexicon edited with Word. Ho can I get rid of this plug in ? Yours, Jean-Louis Le 28/05/2025 à 09:47, Lorenz Buehmann a écrit : > > That must be something related to an installed Ontop plugin - their > custom format does use the *.obda file extension. > > Did you install that plugin? Maybe also worked with Ontop in the meantime? > > > Lorenz > > On 27.05.25 18:59, Michael DeBellis wrote: >> Jean-Louis, FYI, I don't think this is a problem with 5.6.4 in >> general because I can't recall seeing that error and I use 5.6.4 more >> or less every day on some fairly large and complex ontologies. My >> best guess is that it has to do with some plugin. I wasn't sure what >> ODBA meant in this context. My first thought is: Object-Database >> Access and it has something to do with a plugin for connecting the >> A-Box with a relational database... but that is purely a guess. Also, >> in general, a Warning isn't all that serious. On the other hand, when >> you get text in Red it often is a serious error. But as I looked at >> that second image (Log Preferences) more carefully, I realized that >> is just a generic message on the preferences for defining your log >> preferences so the red in that message (at least I'm pretty sure) is >> not an actual error but rather an example (hence the foos and bars) >> of what different kinds of errors will look like with your current >> log settings. >> >> Again, my best guess is the issue is a Plugin. For example, I use a >> Plugin that always causes an error if I try to open one of the >> Windows where I'm using the plugin without first running the reasoner >> and I just ignore it. Do you get the "Reasoner Active" message after >> you run the reasoner? Does the reasoner make expected inferences and >> can you click on a "?" and get explanations? If yes then it probably >> isn't that serious an error. >> >> Some suggestions: >> >> 1) Search through the log for "plugin" or look where you get the >> messages and see if it mentions any plugins. >> 2) Copy the entire log and paste it into a text file using something >> like Notepad and send the entire Log file. >> 3) If the sample ontology isn't that large and isn't proprietary send >> that as well. >> 4) Create a new ontology, perhaps with just one class and one >> instance and one data property and see if you still get the error. >> >> Also, I asked ChatGPT what ODBA meant in the context of Protege. The >> answer may not be correct but I'll paste it below just because it may >> be of some use. >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> https://www.michaeldebellis.com/blog >> >> From ChatGPT: >> >> In the context of *Protégé* and OWL ontologies, *ODBA* typically >> stands for: >> >> *OWL Direct Binary Access* >> >> This refers to a *plugin or internal mechanism* within Protégé >> (especially in its more advanced or research-focused configurations) >> that allows the system to *directly access OWL ontologies in a binary >> format* for performance optimization. >> >> >> Key points: >> >> * >> >> *ODBA* is not a standard OWL term—it’s an internal or >> experimental component used in certain builds of Protégé, >> especially those connected with *ELK reasoner* or >> high-performance OWL EL reasoning. >> >> * >> >> It often appears in logs or UI components when Protégé is trying >> to *optimize access to large ontologies*. >> >> * >> >> In some cases, you might see things like |ODBA Plugin| or >> references to ODBA storage in *reasoner preferences*, especially >> if you're using reasoners or tools developed at TU Dresden or >> Stanford. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> If You Saw It in the UI or a Log Message: >> >> It might be indicating that Protégé is using *binary-optimized >> access* to speed up parsing or reasoning. It’s not something most >> ontology engineers need to configure directly unless doing >> performance tuning. >> >> Would you like to paste the full context where you saw “ODBA”? That >> might help confirm whether it's the binary access layer or something >> else. >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 9:28 AM Jean-Louis Janin >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I don't understand this uncomplete warning message, briefly >> available >> and reading as follows: >> >> "[WARN] No ODBA model was loaded because no .odba file exists i... >> click to open the log" >> >> It appears regularly with Protégé Desktop 5.6.4 through an orange >> ! (see >> attached screen shots). >> >> Would anybody propose an explanation for this "potential" warning ? >> >> How could I create an ODBA file ? For what purpose ? >> >> Regards, >> >> Jean-Louis Janin >> _______________________________________________ >> protege-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> protege-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user > -- > Lorenz Bühmann > Research Associate/Scientific Developer > > [email protected] > > Institute for Applied Informatics e.V. (InfAI) | Goerdelerring 9 | 04109 Leipzig | Germany > > _______________________________________________ > protege-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user _______________________________________________ protege-user mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user