Re: Multiple patterns for matching within socklog?
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.pape.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gerrit Pape <pape <at> smarden.org> writes: > [ ... ] > > Hmm, how about?: > > -* > +mail.*:*:*:*imap* > +mail.*:*:*:*pop* > > and > > -* > +mail.* > -mail.*:*:*:*imap* > -mail.*:*:*:*pop* Now, I have a related question: If I'm using these filters and I then want to send the same info to stderr, will the non-stderr filters be in effect at the time I issue the 'e' and 'E' filters, or do I have to repeat the same filtering patterns for the stderr rules? In other words, if after all this "imap" and "pop" filtering is done, I want to send lines with the string "error" in them to stderr, which is correct, option "A" or option "B"? option A: -* +mail.* -mail.*:*:*:*imap* -mail.*:*:*:*pop* e*:*:*:*error* option B: -* +mail.* -mail.*:*:*:*imap* -mail.*:*:*:*pop* E* email.* Email.*:*:*:*imap* Email.*:*:*:*pop* e*:*:*:*error* Thanks.