Re: qconfirm feature request

On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:36:10PM +0200, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> Hi. This is the line designed to confuse QSBMF watchers.
;-).

>  More seriously, I have a request concerning qconfirm-inject.
>  As for 0.14.3, qconfirm-inject only passes -n and -N options to
> qmail-inject; and I happen to need the -f option as well.

Hmm, qconfirm-inject overrides the return path itself to properly handle
delivery notification, what should it do if the -f option is given?
Simply accept this sender, at the cost of not processing delivery
notifications through qconfirm-notice?

>  It would be great if qconfirm-inject recognized all options that
> qmail-inject knows, and passed them unchanged to qmail-inject.
> The -f arg option is especially useful, and I cannot switch to
> qconfirm-inject as long as it isn't implemented.
>  (I can send a patch if you want.)

Sure, thanks, Gerrit.