Re: Faulty bounces are "confirming" spam
Gerrit Pape <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.pape.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:52:01PM -0400, Chris Johnson wrote: > A spam or so a day has been getting past qconfirm recently. It happens > when someone sends spam with an address that has a valid domain but an > invalid user name, and the mail exchanger for that domain bounces the > confirmation message to the address in the From header rather than the > envelope address. This "confirms" the message, and the spam ends up in > my inbox. > > Would it make sense to ignore confirmations that have an empty > envelope sender? Would it break anything? Unfortunately there's no standard defined as far as I know, let alone agreed upon, on how a delivery confirmation message must look like. So you cannot be sure I think. Regards, Gerrit.