Re: tcpsvd vs. tcpserver
Gerrit Pape <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.pape.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20041018165607.20815.qmail@2ae89788883997.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> |
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 10:30:27AM -0400, Charlie Brady wrote: > What I've found useful is to generate one config file for each policy I > wish to implement (in my case, only "local" and "default"), and generate > a set of symlinks for each network specification, viz: 0 -> default, > 192.168.1 -> local, 127.0.0.1 -> local, 10.39.155 -> local. [This approach > is perfect for me, since I generate all my config from a db of service > policies and network lists; it may be less useful if you expect a human to > construct the files and symlinks.] I suggest to have the policy files start with a dot. If ipsvd is run with the -h option, a dns query could return "local" or "default", and so possibly bypass the instructions. dot-files are included into the cdb, so you can also safely use them as "forward" in a check hostname instruction. Regards, Gerrit.