Re: exit code trigger for STARTTLS (Re: sslio as a STARTTLS wrapper)
Scott Gifford <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.pape.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Scott Gifford wrote: > [...] >> I think a single-character on a pipe is probably better, though. :) > > So you don't believe your own advocacy? :-) I made a good case, but in the end I just wasn't able to see eye-to-eye with myself. :) Hey, this is why I warned you I was still in brainstorming mode. :) >> I don't really have any objections to OpenSSL ... > > Its record tells us that it hasn't been designed from ground up to be > string/buffer safe. Do you think matrixssl has better security, or that it's just newer and less popular, so fewer bugs have been found? >> or patching qmail-smtpd, > > Can't be included in binary distributions. Yeah. I've been on the qmail list so long I sometimes forget the license is horrible. :) ----ScottG.