Re: Q: Auto-confirmation?

Gerrit Pape <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.misc.pape.general
Message-ID <20050311183931.31409.qmail@21efbf68224a7b.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:15:12AM -0500, Leonard R. Budney wrote:
> I did a search for auto-confirmation, and found Gerrit's emails in 
> early 2004 indicating that he was working on the problem. Is there a 
> solution available today? Ideally, it should handle qconfirm, TMDA and 
> qsecretary confirmation requests.

Yes.  I implemented the idea discussed in
 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.devel/5836

and it works pretty well for me, not only for auto-confirming, but also
to separate valid delivery notifications from those caused by mail with
forged envelopes.  See here for some documentation
 http://smarden.org/qconfirm/technical.html#outgoing
 http://smarden.org/qconfirm/technical.html#request
 http://smarden.org/qconfirm/qconfirm-inject.1.html
 http://smarden.org/qconfirm/qconfirm-notice.1.html

Ideally qconfirm should use some crypto instead of keeping track of
outgoing mail in a directory, so that you don't necessarily need to
inject mail on the mail server.

It handles qconfirm's requests, and optionally tmda's.  It doesn't for
qsecretary; if qsecretary would add a Message-ID as suggested above, it
would work automatically.

Regards, Gerrit.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.