Re: Q: Auto-confirmation?
Gerrit Pape <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.pape.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20050311183931.31409.qmail@21efbf68224a7b.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> |
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:15:12AM -0500, Leonard R. Budney wrote: > I did a search for auto-confirmation, and found Gerrit's emails in > early 2004 indicating that he was working on the problem. Is there a > solution available today? Ideally, it should handle qconfirm, TMDA and > qsecretary confirmation requests. Yes. I implemented the idea discussed in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.devel/5836 and it works pretty well for me, not only for auto-confirming, but also to separate valid delivery notifications from those caused by mail with forged envelopes. See here for some documentation http://smarden.org/qconfirm/technical.html#outgoing http://smarden.org/qconfirm/technical.html#request http://smarden.org/qconfirm/qconfirm-inject.1.html http://smarden.org/qconfirm/qconfirm-notice.1.html Ideally qconfirm should use some crypto instead of keeping track of outgoing mail in a directory, so that you don't necessarily need to inject mail on the mail server. It handles qconfirm's requests, and optionally tmda's. It doesn't for qsecretary; if qsecretary would add a Message-ID as suggested above, it would work automatically. Regards, Gerrit.