Re: Debian package dependencies

Gerrit Pape <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.misc.pape.general
Message-ID <20050901091643.22139.qmail@0b9a9a538196e0.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:34:38PM +0100, Rik Hemsley wrote:
> I have considered switching to the qconfirm package (.deb) rather than a 
> compiled-by-hand version, in the hope that I'll get upgrades 
> automatically in future, should any be released.
> 
> When I attempt an install of qconfirm, apt attempts to install custom 
> versions of qmail, daemontools and ucspi-tcp, with 'smarden.org' within 
> their version strings.
> 
> The installation of qconfirm doesn't require any patching of these three 
> pieces of software; are these versions really custom, and if so, are 
> they necessary?

The qmail packages for Debian from smarden.org aren't patched at all,
they just integrate the official qmail-1.03 installation into Debian's
package management system.

> I'm keen to avoid any possible disruption of existing mail services, so 
>  would like to stick with my existing qmail, daemontools and ucspi-tcp. 
> Is this possible or advisable, or are the smarden.org versions required?

I wouldn't suggest to switch to the Debian binary packages if you have a
working installation, you might want to consider them if you set up a
new Debian system with qmail though.  And if you have qmail and co.
installed from source, I would also suggest to not switch to the
qconfirm Debian package, just install it from source as usual.

HTH, Gerrit.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.