Re: 0.7.26 now available
Stephen Wood <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.bitpim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 05:19:39 -0800 (PST), [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Why not just have a two "end" fields. One for end of event, and one >for end of repeating. > > It certainly could, and I'm open for all suggestions. I just don't think it's necessary IMHO, and it might require changes to existing phones' code. If everyone can live with that, I'm all for updating the design schema. > I looked at some vcal spec. It seems like DTDATE, the equivalent of our end date is end time of an instance of a recurring event. However I can't convince myself that it never indicates when the recurring ends. To me, though, the end of an instance of an event, and when a repeating event stops repeating are different concepts and ought to be in different fields. Stephen ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl