Re: Re: [bitpim-cvs-checkins] bitpim bpcalendar.py,1.30,1.31 com_lgvx4650.py,1.1,1.2 p_lgvx4650.p,1.1,1.2 p_lgvx4650.py,1.1,1.2
"Roger Binns" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.bitpim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001a01c5a277$af5af970$3501a8c0@rogersqyvr14d3> |
> Yes, I noticed that also, but was not sure what else is similar > among the other LGs. Since all other LG codes subclass from the > 4400, would it make sense to put the common code there, or in com_lg? In this case, moving the code to com_lg is fine. The TM520 is a previous generation, but everything starting with the VX4400 onwards is roughly similar. Roger ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf