Re: Re: [bitpim-cvs-checkins] bitpim bpcalendar.py,1.30,1.31 com_lgvx4650.py,1.1,1.2 p_lgvx4650.p,1.1,1.2 p_lgvx4650.py,1.1,1.2

"Roger Binns" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.bitpim.devel
Message-ID <001a01c5a277$af5af970$3501a8c0@rogersqyvr14d3>
> Yes, I noticed that also, but was not sure what else is similar 
> among the other LGs.  Since all other LG codes subclass from the 
> 4400, would it make sense to put the common code there, or in com_lg?

In this case, moving the code to com_lg is fine.  The TM520 is
a previous generation, but everything starting with the VX4400 onwards
is roughly similar.

Roger


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.