Re: a quick(?) question
Stephen Wood <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.bitpim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Not sure if this is the problem, but in p_lgpm325.p, there is a line: numbertypetab=( 'Mobile', 'Home', 'Office', 'fax', 'pager' ) I believe that the number types should not be capitalized. Try changing the line to: numbertypetab=( 'mobile', 'home', 'office', 'fax', 'pager' ) and then before running bitpim, do python2.3 protogen.py p_lgpm325.p (This "compiles" the .p file into p_lgpm325.py) If that helps, let me know and I will update the code. Also, if you think the phonebook is being read properly, let me know and I will include PM325 phonebook reading in the next BitPim release. (Presently it will only run from from source, but not compiled releases.) I think where you see dashes in numbers, they are put there by a pretifier. Internally, and in the phonebook editor, it is just numbers (and perhaps *, # and pauses). Stephen PS, if the author of the PM325 code has any updates, please post them. On 10/14/05, Jerad Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was checking out the current PM-325 code, which reads the phone book > data with no apparent issues, and I find that when I double-click an > entry and get the "Edit PhoneBook Entry" window, that under the > numbers tab -> number details -> type, they all default to none, even > though all my numbers have a type displayed in the main window. > > Is this a bug in the 325 code, a bug in BitPim's number cleaner ( I > noticed all the dashes in the numbers are gone), or is this by design? > > Thanks, > Jerad Clark >