RE: alternative filesystem view
"Simon C" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.bitpim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000901c5eb20$1762f810$6400a8c0@HOME> |
> 1. When I first switched to the filesystem tab, it attempted to read data > from the phone and eventually timedout since my phone was not connected. > I prefer the old filesystem's behavior. I'll fix this, what you are seeing is not what I intended. > 2. dirs that have no subdirs should not have the + icons, which would > disappear once expanded, ie dirs should know whether or not they have any > subdir children. I stayed with the existing design to read subdirectories on user demand and remove the + once the directory has been read, this meant that the timing to be similar to the old view. Reading the entire filesystem when it was first expanded takes about 20 seconds on my old 4400. Reading 2 dirs deep is similar. Do you think this delay is acceptable; I can change the code to behave like this. Simon ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click