RE: alternative filesystem view
"Simon C" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.bitpim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000001c5edb5$5d950d40$6400a8c0@HOME> |
> > Exactly why I'd like to query the phone for each and every action: > > the filesystem view is stateless. > > From the CVS commit it looked like whether an item had subdirectories > was being remembered. The original code used to 'update' the tree view with responses from the phone every time a user expanded a directory. This meant that if a portion of the tree view was not queried it would remain unchanged. The way it is at the moment all subdirectories under a directory being expanded are deleted even if they are not queried from the phone. I don't think the way that this is implemented at the moment looks very good visually, regardless of the accuracy. Collapsing a directory with expanded subdirectories and re-expanding causes the subdirectories to briefly show their original contents before they disappear, it would be better if they never appeared at all. Personally I prefer the original way of only updating the parts of the file system that have been queried from the phone rather than deleting all and starting again. This is way that filesystem viewers work on windows and linux and would be what users would be expecting. Simon ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click