Re: Prelim LG-VX5300 patches
Roger Binns <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.bitpim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bart Massey wrote: > As I said in my previous email, you have my > complete approval to put any BitPim-related code I've ever > written into the distribution; please do with this code as > you will, and let me know if you need some more formal > document. The easiest thing to do is supply all your files as a zip/tar.gz and copy the header from one of the existing files. That header will include your copyright as well as placing the code under the GPL(*). Alternatively you'll have to assign the copyright to us, but that is more work. Note your statement above is more restrictive than the GPL since it restricts the code to being placed into BitPim only. (Obviously you didn't intend this, but doing what it says in the first paragraph makes everything clear and legal). (*) We use a very slightly modified GPL for BitPim. The GPL allows linking to standard system libraries that aren't "free". At one point we tried to use SSL for BitFling, which requires linking to the non-free OpenSSL libraries. The OpenSSL libraries are shipped with the OS on Linux and Mac and hence there is no problem there. However OpenSSL is not a standard Windows library. Consequently the BitPim GPL has a relaxation allowing linking to OpenSSL. SSH is now used (paramiko) but should we ever need OpenSSL again, that provision is nice. In any case removing the provision would require the copyright holder of every single line of code to agree which is unlikely just from a logistics point of view. Roger ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV