Re: bitpim and libusb

A move to libusb 1.0 would help on the mac side as well. 
--
Sean Patrick Burke
Full time law student, part time developer
http://www.bitpim.org




On Jan 13, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:

> Nathan Hjelm <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> Is anyone opposed to this change? If not I would like to
>> make the changes before the release of 1.0.7.
> 
> That sounds reasonable.  In the long term, you might want to consider
> migrating to PyUSB <http://pyusb.berlios.de/>, but its stable branch
> only supports libusb 0.1, so that's not really an option just yet.
> 
> -- 
> Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
> Finger [email protected] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
> _______________________________________________
> BitPim-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev