RE: DLR on AT

I'm working on DLR on AT2, but to do that properly, I need to drasticly
change the implementation of at2_wait_modem_command, and I'm not yet
sure how I want the interface to be. 
I already have DLR for SMSC_SUCCESS and SMSC_FAIL, which was the reason
why I started the whole thing in the first place, so I'm in no hurry :-)

I think this is a good time to ask the list for some ideas - 
the main problem I see, is that at2_wait_modem_command handles anything
that comes its way, until it either encounter an error, a timeout (no
more data) or the modem's "please send me more data" prompt, and the
return code only suggest the exit state. for a proper DLR
implementation, I would also require the command to return the message
ID the modem returned, and for my own purposes (some patch that I'm not
yet ready to release) I would like to know how many incoming messages
the command processed. my current implementation is to send "output
parameters" to the command - which is ugly as most calls would not need
to send those parameters, but I don't think C supports any cleaner
interface (like default parameters, for example).

Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[email protected]

--
If you don't go to other men's funerals they won't go to yours.
	-- Clarence Day

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abd Rahman Johari [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:58 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: DLR on AT
> 
> 
> hi guys,
> 
> i just wondering anybody is working on DLR for AT or AT2 ?
> 
> 
> 
> thanks :)
> 
> -man-
>