RE: global-sender on a smsc basis ?

Ok, obvious. I guess I need a rest....

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Andreas Fink [mailto:[email protected]]
Enviado el: martes 29 de enero de 2002 16:47
Para: Angel Fradejas
CC: [email protected]
Asunto: RE: global-sender on a smsc basis ?


>Ok, I could rework my patch to take this into account.
>
>So we'd have
>
>smsbox       global-sender
>sms-service  faked-sender
>smsc         default-sender
>And of course an optional &from= in every message.
>
>And bearerbox behaviour would be
>
>&from=            never overrideable by smsc default-sender
>global-sender     overrideable by smsc default-sender (only if applied by
>smsbox)
>faked-sender      overrideable by smsc default-sender (only if applied by
>smsbox)
>an empty sender   overrideable by smsc default-sender
>
>I do not know the impact of having message in bearerbox with an empty
>sender. Will any driver complain about that?
>
>Before going any further with this implementation, I would like to hear
what
>to do if a message goes all the way to bearerbox with an empty sender and
>there's not default-sender.

you can set the default sender in smsbox but have a flag indicate
that it can be overriden by a more specific default (smsc specific
one).

--

Andreas Fink
Fink-Consulting

------------------------------------------------------------------
Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729  Mobile: +41-79-2457333
Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
E-Mail:  [email protected]  Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/  Nickname afink