Re: Mutex failure
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wapme Systems AG |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Uoti Urpala wrote: > > Does changing the order of the unlock_in() and unlock_out() statements > at the end of conn_register() in conn.c help? It fixes at least one race > condition in HTTP code. no, this does at least not change behaviour for the HTTP/1.1 CPU cycling problem we get on Linux that I described in my summary report. My CPU usage here on the bearerbox raises to 99% and keep remaining. We need some mutex and pthread experts! -- someone knowing where to grap them? Stipe [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are