I minor error found in gw/smsc_at2.c

"Nektarios K. Papadopoulos" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I am using smsc_at with a NOKIA Premicell.

Thoughth to give a try on smsc_at2. What I was getting was something
like:

2002-02-20 01:20:24 [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: <-- +CSMS: (0)
2002-02-20 01:20:24 [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: <-- OK
2002-02-20 01:20:24 [6] INFO: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: Phase 2+ is supported
2002-02-20 01:20:24 [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: --> AT+CSMS=1^M
2002-02-20 01:20:24 [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS1]: <-- ERROR

I looke my AT command reference and the code and think that I should not
get

Phase 2+ is supported

I think that passing octstr_case_compare to list_search, makes it to
search for at least one non matching list element, insteat for one
matching.
So I suggest changing it to octstr_item_match, since we care only for
digits.

the diff with todays cvs is attached, in case I am not wrong.

By the way with the proposed changes my Premicell works fine.
smsc_at2.c.diff (application/octet-stream, 913 B)
Index: gw/smsc_at2.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/gateway/gw/smsc_at2.c,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.21 smsc_at2.c
--- gw/smsc_at2.c	2002/02/08 17:30:18	1.21
+++ gw/smsc_at2.c	2002/02/19 18:33:38
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@
 	}
 	vals = octstr_split(ts, octstr_imm(","));
 	octstr_destroy(ts);
-	ts = list_search(vals, octstr_imm("1"),(void *) octstr_case_compare);
+	ts = list_search(vals, octstr_imm("1"),(void *) octstr_item_match);
 	if(ts)
 	    privdata->phase2plus = 1;
 	list_destroy(vals,(void *) at2_octstr_destroy);
@@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@
 	}
 	vals = octstr_split(ts, octstr_imm(","));
 	octstr_destroy(ts);
-	ts = list_search(vals, octstr_imm("1"),(void *) octstr_case_compare);
+	ts = list_search(vals, octstr_imm("1"),(void *) octstr_item_match);
 	if(ts)
 	    privdata->phase2plus = 1;
 	list_destroy(vals,(void *) at2_octstr_destroy);
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.