Re: picture mess

"Alexei Pashkovsky" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <005501c1bb59$b2e9e140$3b0035c1@vaio>
Hi,
try to analize the SMPP packet dump.
Edit gw/smsc_smpp.c, enable debug, and see what it sends, you might send me
if you want me to takea look on it.
Than send message concatenated manually and see the difference.
I had some scripts to manually concatenate messages, might be sharing with
you if you want.

----- Original Message -----
From: "P. A. Bagyenda" <[email protected]>
To: "Valter Santos" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Peter Löfman" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: picture mess


> Hi,
>
>  I'm not sure that that solves the problem. Even with the current
> snapshot, any attempt at setting concatenation=true (using SMPP code),
> causes the phone to receive junk. And you need this to be able to send
> operator logos. Using the snapshot of 16th, with concatenation = true
> (SMPP, Comverse SMSC) doesn't seem to work for text or data. Any ideas
> anybody?
>
> P.
>
> Valter Santos wrote:
> >
> > Hi there!
> >
> > > I'm trying to send a nokia picture message, but I believe that I have
> > something wrong.....
> > > This is how it looks:
> > > &udh=%06%05%04%15%82%00%00&text=%00%48%1c%01%1d%c9%82%62%61%c8% ....
....
> > .....
> >
> > the udh that you are using is to send operator logos... for normal
picutes
> > you should use udh=%06%05%04%15%8A%00%00
> > Anyway, if you still wanna to send logos you should include MCC/MNC
> > information before the text message. You can see this
> > information for your operator in
> > http://users.zipworld.com.au/~rmills/MCCandMNCValues.htm
> >
> > hope this help
> > /valter
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Peter Löfman" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:05 AM
> > Subject: picture mess
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to send a nokia picture message, but I believe that I have
> > something wrong.....
> > This is how it looks:
> > &udh=%06%05%04%15%82%00%00&text=%00%48%1c%01%1d%c9%82%62%61%c8% ....
....
> > .....
> >
> > is the udh incorrect?
> >
> > Does anyone have an example of a working picture?
> >
> > /Peter Lofman
>
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.