RE: last CVS updates

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:10 PM
> Cc: Kannel-devel (E-mail); Nick Clarey; David Holland
> Subject: Re: last CVS updates
> 
> 
> Oded Arbel wrote:
> > And while where here already - what about Angel's 
> default-sender patch ?
> > will it go into CVS ?
> 
> this depends on the pros and cons of the list. As long as there is no
> consence in the list and there is no-one actually reviewing the patch
> and stating that it is ok, I guess it is still scheduled.

I'd really love to see it in - I tested it and I feel ok with it. it's
not very important for me, but it does solve a minor issue we've been
having. AFAIR, I haven't read anyone who said that the patch is broken
(except for the missing octstr_destroy for which I submitted a patch).

> At least I'm "blocked" for this week, after that I will engage all
> point that are open. But please consider this not as "ok, then we'll
> wait!". I'd rather see more activity from the cvs write permission
> owner, otherwise we'll vote for adding users like you Oded to have
> write permission and step on with development. Just my 2ct.

I would like that :-)


Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[email protected]

--
Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
	-- Dorothy Parker
	Reply to her editor who was bugging her for her belated work
while she was on her honeymoon