Re: New Stable release

"Alexei Pashkovsky" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <005201c1be4e$b8d2bdf0$3b0035c1@vaio>
Sure we can, someone has to merge two things and add config variable , than
we have to test it for a few weeks .. are you sure thats what you want ?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruno David Rodrigues" <[email protected]>
To: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:43 AM
Subject: Re: New Stable release


> Cant we have it configurable in ./configure or config file to choose
between
> direct, sim card or phone memory has I suggested before ?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:40 PM
> Subject: Re: New Stable release
>
>
> As regarding to SIM buffering patches :
> I don't think these are to be included in any type of stable version, and
> there's a very simple and clear reason.
> Sim card has flash memory where it stores those messages if they are not
> requested to be output to the prompt by terminal.
> Every flash memory card has it's life circle , which is pretty short
> comparing to count of messages one would want to receive/send with it in
> production environment.
> Let's say normal Sim will not live if you save to it over 10.000 - 50.000
> sms.
> While   10.000 seems to be a huge number, it is not actually that big, and
> in production environments I personally saw a sim card which received over
> 100.000 sms.
> This would not be possible if it would be over the "Sim buffering"
technics,
> the card would simply go screwed.
> So far, I suppose this buffering conception is for risky people only, and
we
> definately would not want to include in stable release something that
could
> damage user's hardware.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stipe Tolj" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:19 AM
> Subject: Re: New Stable release
>
>
> > Oded Arbel wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not absolutly sure we don't need AT anymore, but I think it would
> > > probably be a good idea. if we need something that only AT does
(nothing
> > > AFAIK) we can always grab it from the CVS.
> > > what about the SIM buffering patches - do you think these should be
> > > merged in the old/new AT module ?
> >
> > I haven't reviewed them and I'm out of time scope until next Sunday.
> >
> > If anyone other can suggest in merging the patch in please take your
> > heads up on the list and present your review results and tell us how
> > far you have tested it.
> >
> > Stipe
> >
> > [email protected]
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Wapme Systems AG
> >
> > Münsterstr. 248
> > 40470 Düsseldorf
> >
> > Tel: +49-211-74845-0
> > Fax: +49-211-74845-299
> >
> > E-Mail: [email protected]
> > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > wapme.net - wherever you are
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.