RE: last CVS updates

Hi all,

Just to let you know, I have been using this default-sender functionality in
our production environment for three months now, with a (I think)
respectable traffic (80000+ MO per day) , and 16 SMS-C connections (smpp,
emi2, and custom drivers). No problems 'till now.

BTW, sorry for the missing ocstr_destroy, it were called only once at smsbox
exit, so memory was not growing and I didn't see it.

Angel Fradejas.


-----Mensaje original-----
De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]En
nombre de Oded Arbel
Enviado el: lunes 25 de febrero de 2002 14:20
Para: Stipe Tolj
CC: Kannel-devel (E-mail)
Asunto: RE: last CVS updates


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:10 PM
> Cc: Kannel-devel (E-mail); Nick Clarey; David Holland
> Subject: Re: last CVS updates
>
>
> Oded Arbel wrote:
> > And while where here already - what about Angel's
> default-sender patch ?
> > will it go into CVS ?
>
> this depends on the pros and cons of the list. As long as there is no
> consence in the list and there is no-one actually reviewing the patch
> and stating that it is ok, I guess it is still scheduled.

I'd really love to see it in - I tested it and I feel ok with it. it's
not very important for me, but it does solve a minor issue we've been
having. AFAIR, I haven't read anyone who said that the patch is broken
(except for the missing octstr_destroy for which I submitted a patch).

> At least I'm "blocked" for this week, after that I will engage all
> point that are open. But please consider this not as "ok, then we'll
> wait!". I'd rather see more activity from the cvs write permission
> owner, otherwise we'll vote for adding users like you Oded to have
> write permission and step on with development. Just my 2ct.

I would like that :-)


Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[email protected]

--
Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
	-- Dorothy Parker
	Reply to her editor who was bugging her for her belated work
while she was on her honeymoon