Re: REPOST : Problem with keepalive feature of emi2 and receive-port configuration

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gildas PERROT" <[email protected]>
To: "Bruno David Rodrigues" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:02 AM
Subject: RE: REPOST : Problem with keepalive feature of emi2 and
receive-port configuration


> Hi Bruno,
>
> Thanks a lot for your help. I am not sure when you say "the keepalive
> timeout is only restarted on
> sending an operation  31 or 51" that you understand what I needed. Do you
> mean that you will restart keepalive timeout only if UCP51 is sent (not
when
> UCP52 is received) ? That's what I need.

Yes, keepalive were beeing restarted on every sent packets, including
response
to a incoming -52.

Now it only restarts when sending an O-31 or O-51

And it is now on cvs.

>
> Thanks in advance for your answer. Gildas.
>
> PS : is your patch will be integrated in Kannel CVS version ?
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]De la part de Bruno David Rodrigues
> Envoyé : mardi 5 mars 2002 22:55
> À : Gildas PERROT; Devel@Kannel
> Objet : Re: REPOST : Problem with keepalive feature of emi2 and
> receive-port configuration
>
>
> I'm commiting a patch where the keepalive timeout is only restarted on
> sending an operation  31 or 51. Is it ok for you ?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gildas PERROT" <[email protected]>
> To: "Devel@Kannel" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 3:27 PM
> Subject: REPOST : Problem with keepalive feature of emi2 and receive-port
> configuration
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to sum up what has been said about keepalive of emi2 when
using
> receive-port.
> Here is my configuration, MT are sent on one connection to my broker and
MO
> are received on another connection (receive-port defined). I want to
> maintain MT connection active since my broker needs it and I was thinking
to
> use UCP31 for that purpose. The problem is that if UCP52 are received, the
> keepalive timeout is restarted but is should not be since UCP31 are only
> sent on the MT connection (I checked with tcpdump). Am I right ? If yes,
is
> it possible for somebody to modify Kannel code in order to not take UCP52
in
> account for the keepalive timeout restarting ?
> My other question is : is it better to use a bidirectional connection (MT
> and MO on the same connection) ?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help. Gildas.
>
> PS : I am using the last CVS version.
>
> ---
> Gildas PERROT, [email protected]
> Fluxus, 30, rue du Château des Rentiers, 75647 Paris Cedex 13   __o
> http://www.fluxus.net                                      ---_`\<,_
> Fluxus est une société B.T. Ignite                     ----- (_)/ (_)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>